Mental disorders are typically seen as caused by an excess or deficit of certain neurotransmitters.
However, is this ever so popular 'chemical imbalance' theory thoroughly backed up by good science?
The DSM-III
established psychiatry as a medical specialty, allowing psychiatrists to don
the white coat and expand their prescribing powers. The introduction of Thorazine
(chlorpromazine) in 1954 sparked up the psychopharmacological “revolution.”
However, this drug was first introduced as a major tranquilizer (because it was
used as an anesthetic for surgery – psychiatrists used the drug’s “side effects”
to help sedate troublesome schizophrenic patients; they believed it produced a
chemical lobotomy.) The term that we’re more familiar with – antipsychotic –
was developed later as a marketing scheme to emphasize that it treats an underlying disease. Antipsychotics,
antidepressants, anti-anxiety agents, are not scientific terms but marketing
terms in order to describe what they are supposed to treat as what they’re
supposed to do. Antidepressants were first called psychic energizers.
Anti-anxiety agents were first called minor tranquilizers.
In the midst of
discovering magic bullets for infectious diseases, like antibiotics to combat bacteria, psychiatry sought to catch up with medical
profession to find their own “magic bullet”/miracle cure for mental illness. These
miracle drugs only treat the patient for the short-term. Good long-term
outcomes are rare – in fact, most medications actually worsen long-term outcomes. Now, I’m not saying these psychiatric
medications should be abolished from society. They certainly have their place, but
I believe they should be used in a more limited manner (for short-term
outcomes) and psychosocial, alternative non-drug therapy, good diet, and
exercise should be considered for the long-term. However, the most profitable treatment
is one that you have to take every day for the rest your life. Pharmaceutical
companies and psychiatry work together in such a way that the mentally ill
essentially become a consumer 1st and a patient 2nd. I’m
not saying that you shouldn’t care about money – but shouldn’t a helping
profession (like medical doctors) be more concerned with helping people for the
long-term?
The most popular
theory for the cause of depression is insufficient monoamines (serotonin and
norepinephrine) in the brain. Similarly, schizophrenia is thought to be caused
by an overabundance of dopamine. This biochemical imbalance as a cause for
mental illness is usually described as being exactly like how people with diabetes need insulin treatment for life
– people with mental disorders need medications for life. With the chemical imbalance
theory, psychiatry has a biological disease of the brain in which they can
treat with chronic medications to “correct” this imbalance. However, these “illnesses”
aren’t caused by a chemical imbalance – they’re iatrogenic. The treatment for the disease creates the
chemical imbalance, fueling dependence of the medication. When you take a
mental patient off his daily dose of whatever the case – whether that’s an
antipsychotic, antidepressant, benzodiazepine, stimulant, or a combination, etc.
– that mental patient will experience withdrawal (to say the least), and these
severe symptoms are claimed to be symptoms of the illness. Therefore, in
psychiatry’s logic, you cannot take a mental patient off his medication because
he will become ill (even if his illness clearly became worse after use of
medication.) 850 adults and 250 children are becoming disabled by mental
illness daily (Whitaker, 2010). Children as young as two-years of age are
becoming diagnosed as “bipolar.” The number of disabled children by mental
illness has rose thirty-five fold within the past twenty years, despite these “advances”
in mental health.
If any of the
following information stirs any interest for you, please check out Robert
Whitaker’s book Anatomy of an Epidemic.
Whitaker, R. (2010). Anatomy of an epidemic: Magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the
astonishing rise of mental illness in America. NY: Crown Publishers.
DISCLAIMER: If you or anyone you know is taking a prescriptive psychiatric
medication for stress, anxiety, depression, or any other reason deemed
appropriate by the prescribing physician, alteration or discontinuation of the
drug(s) is NOT recommended. Discontinuation or alteration of prescriptive
medications can be life-threatening and can only be done under the authority
and supervision of a licensed medical doctor!
I have to agree with you that these drugs only worsen long term outcomes. The patients are not really getting any help by it but rather hurting, because of the "symptoms" of the illness after taking away the medication. It is sad to see that children at the age of two are being diagnosed with a mental illness and put on some type of drug. Instead of just opting for a drug psychiatrists should look into other ways of being able to treat their patients. Great post and I will definitely be looking into the book you recommended.
As you mentioned, most medications worsen long-term outcomes which does not surprise me. What is sad is that the doctor's should be more concerned with trying to help their patients and less concerned with the revenue that prescribing those medications bring in. I would agree they should be used for only short periods of time. And as Melissa mentioned it is unfortunate that children are being put on medications at such a young age because of some kind of "illness." I think we should try more to rehabilitate without medications. Good post!
Frankie, I really enjoy reading your deep thought blogs. They are very interesting and will make anyone rethink their position in the method used right now to treat mental illness. I agree with you with all of your points. I will be reading the book in the spring of 2013 since I am loaded with work at this time. Keep up the good work!
I have to agree with you that these drugs only worsen long term outcomes. The patients are not really getting any help by it but rather hurting, because of the "symptoms" of the illness after taking away the medication. It is sad to see that children at the age of two are being diagnosed with a mental illness and put on some type of drug. Instead of just opting for a drug psychiatrists should look into other ways of being able to treat their patients. Great post and I will definitely be looking into the book you recommended.
ReplyDeleteAs you mentioned, most medications worsen long-term outcomes which does not surprise me. What is sad is that the doctor's should be more concerned with trying to help their patients and less concerned with the revenue that prescribing those medications bring in. I would agree they should be used for only short periods of time. And as Melissa mentioned it is unfortunate that children are being put on medications at such a young age because of some kind of "illness." I think we should try more to rehabilitate without medications. Good post!
ReplyDeleteFrankie, I really enjoy reading your deep thought blogs. They are very interesting and will make anyone rethink their position in the method used right now to treat mental illness. I agree with you with all of your points. I will be reading the book in the spring of 2013 since I am loaded with work at this time. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete